台灣行業報導-童話關鍵字技術研究中心

（中央社記者許湘欣台北13日電）第101141期今彩539今晚開獎，中獎號碼為17、25、9、1、5。派彩結果網頁設計，頭獎無人中獎。



貳獎共有257注中獎，每注可得獎金2萬元；參獎8136注中獎，每注可得300元；肆獎8萬6957注中獎，每注可得50元。

本期三星彩中獎號碼為660，派彩結果，正彩有19注中獎，每注可得獎金1萬2500元。組彩中的3組彩有60注中獎，每注可得4000元；對彩有723注中獎，每注可得750元。

4星彩中獎號碼為6213，派彩結果，正彩有10注中獎，每注可得獎金12萬5000元網頁設計。組彩中的24組彩有230注中獎麻辣火鍋，每注可得5000元清潔公司。1010613

文章來源： 中央社搬家公司

瑞典SAAB汽車的破產管理人，已經找到了接手的買家，瑞典媒體報導說，新的買家是港日合資的中日電動車聯盟。



SAAB曾經是瑞典主要工業象徵墾丁民宿，90年代之後經營陷入困境高雄監視器安裝，後來出售給美國的通用汽車集團。2010年，本身也出現大幅虧損的通用汽車TOEIC，將SAAB汽車轉售給荷蘭的荷蘭世爵汽車，但是一年之後，SAAB汽車宣告破產。

SAAB汽車的破產管理人，一直再尋找接手買家，而大陸浙江青年汽車集團一直有意接手，但顯然他們鎩羽而歸鹼性電池。至於SAAB新買家的細節，將晚些公布。

新聞提供： 中廣新聞網猛男秀

新頭殼newtalk 2012.06.14 翁嫆琄/台北報導



瑞典知名車廠Saab在瑞典時間13日確定了新東家，未來將由NEVS瑞典國家電動汽車收購該公司大部份資產，並由NEVS取得經營權。台灣總代理商富公司今(14)日也發出聲明強調，台灣零件供應及新車上市不會受影響，公司也將持續提供車主完整保固。

擁有60多年歷史的瑞典車廠Saab因重整失敗，前最大股東通用汽車擔心公司的智財權落入中國車廠手中，因此拒絕中國浙江青年蓮花汽車公司的收購要求，Saab的執行長穆勤(Victor Muller)只好在2011年12月19日正式宣布破產。

因聲請破產，Saab截自目前為止是由法院管理者接管系統流理台，包括Anne-Marie Pouteaux - Wistrand聯合律師事務所、Hans L. Bergqvist - Delphi聯合律師事務所等破產管理者在13日共同召開記者會，說明已與『NEVS瑞典國家電動汽車National Electric Vehicle Sweden』簽定協議台灣伴手禮，收購Saab汽車的主要資產，包括Saab汽車公司、Saab動力總成公司及Saab工具公司。

NEVS是由日本油漆工程行、瑞典、中國的股東組成的國際控股集團，完成收購後，該公司預計將建立一個新的汽車合資企業，專門研發及製造電動車。按計畫，研發的第一款車型將以現行的Saab 9-3為基礎，採用日本的電動車技術，修改成電力驅動，目標是在2013~2014年間上市，希望藉此掌握全球日趨成長的電動車市場。

不過，Saab零件公司並未被收購，因此該公司仍將由瑞典國家債務辦公室掌管，獨立營運。目前Saab零件公司擁有2間分別在英國及北美的子公司。

Saab台灣總代理商富公司今天表示，由於汽車零件仍獨立營運，因此不受重整影響，台灣的零件供應不會有問題洋酒價格查詢。

另外，在台灣售出的新車及原廠認證中古車沙發工廠，也將持續提供完整保固。至於原本預計將上市的Saab 9-3 Turbo4車款，發售情況也不會受影響，將按照原先計畫如期上市。

文章來源： 新頭殼

提供領先製造商的三維模型，為維修市場的工程師帶來更強大的技術資源



新加坡2012年6月14日電 /美通社亞洲/ -- 全球最大的電子和維修產品服務分銷商 Electrocomponents plc 集團公司(LSE:ECM)旗下的貿易品牌RS Component新增了2,000多種自動化和控制澎湖旅行社產品新模型，進一步擴充其廣泛的網上三維CAD 模型庫。這些模型均來自業內領先製造商，如Siemens、Omron、SMC、Parker Legris、Ace Products及Nuvotem等。這些可於 RS Components 網站免費下載的模型具備卓越的功能，能讓工程師及機械和面板建造師有效縮短設計時間，在競爭日益激烈的維修市場中佔有優勢。

RS Components模型庫現在擁有總數逾30,000款獲認證的完整電子及機械元件三維 CAD 模型，提供多達23種中立及原生三維 CAD 格式的全新模型供註冊用戶免費下載，讓其匯入各種受歡迎的 CAD 套件中使用。工程師可藉此自由選擇他們偏好的CAD軟體套件進行機械設計，達成更快速的產品整合。為方便用戶辨別零件並加快產品下單的處理速度，每一款三維模型均標有 RS Components 零件編號系統家具。這些新模型涵蓋 RS Components 完整的自動化和控制產品，包括最新的可程式邏輯控制器、氣動控制器和元件、工業控制器及開關和安全元件。

Electrocomponents 維修部經理 Kevin Thompson 表示：「今日的工程師無時無刻都在想方法縮短設計時間，而更短的設計週期更是攸關項目成敗的關鍵。透過在設計流程中使用我們免費的三維 CAD 模型墾丁哪裡好玩，我們的客戶可以省下從頭建立模型需要耗費的大量寶貴時間。而這只是 RS 為全球維修及電子工程師開發具備可靠技術的網上資源所推出的眾多計劃之一倉儲管理。」

關於 RS Components

RS Components 和 Allied Electronics 為全球最大的電子和維修產品分銷商 Electrocomponents plc 旗下的貿易品牌。集團利用遍佈32個國家的運營網絡，透過互聯網、目錄和櫃檯為一百多萬個客戶提供服務刺青，分銷550,000多款產品，同日訂單發貨件數高達46,000多件。集團分銷的產品來自2,500家領先供應商，涵蓋包括電子、自動化和控制、TEST和測量、電氣和機械在內的元件。

Electrocomponents 集團已在倫敦證券交易所上市，截至2012年3月31日的上個財政年度的營業收入為12.7億英鎊。

欲瞭解更多資訊，請瀏覽我們的網站： www.rs-components.com。

編輯部聯絡人 :

RS Components

Tan Soo Chun

亞太區公關經理

電話：+65-6391-5745

電郵：soochun.tan@rs-components.com

The Hoffman Agency

Rasheed Abu Bakar / Ian Lee

電話： +65-6361-0250

電郵： rscomponentsteam@hoffman.com

欲知更多內容，請瀏覽下方連結 :

Linkedin: RS Components

http://www.linkedin.com/company/rs-components

Electrocomponents plc

www.electrocomponents.com

RS Components

www.rs-components.com

DesignSpark

http://www.designspark.com

轉載自～ 美通社

RICS 提交予發展局有關起動東九龍項目的政策建議重點



香港2012年6月13日電 /美通社亞洲/ -- 英國皇家特許測量師學會 (「The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors」或簡稱"RICS")成立了「起動九龍東工作小組」，目的為增加商業用地網頁設計，維護香港在區域內的競爭力。該小組早前提供一個政策框架予發展局參考宜蘭民宿。

RICS 香港根據英國倫敦碼頭區、金絲雀碼頭、日本幕張展覽區及新加坡濱海灣等外國案例研究結果，認為政府需為九龍東制定一個長遠規劃，在未來15至20年內為市民打造一個工作、生活及娛樂集一身的地方。

RICS提出九龍東發展的5個重點建議：

發展東九龍成為另一個商業核心區，並非僅作為另一個後勤辦公室區域；

發展成多元化社區，照顧區內市民的工作清潔公司、生活及娛樂需求；

建設完善交通網絡，不僅連接區內與香港各區，更需在區內建設多元化運輸方式；

建立足夠配套設施，包括旅遊景點、零售商舖、活動場地及保育計劃；

盡快補充市區住宅及商廈供應短缺，以提高香港作為亞洲國際都會的競爭力。

「現行的制度必須改變，以加速重建日漸老化的傳統工業區。」RICS起動九龍東工作小組主席霍嘉禮表示：「我們建議九龍東發展辦事處需有足夠權力及資源，以簡化各項審批及監管程序，令發展動力不會被窒礙。」

RICS香港同時建議，新成立的起動九龍東辦事處，須充份諮詢，結合專業團體、學者、海外顧問及來自區內不同行業代表組成的起動九龍東辦事處小組的意見。

在提交的文件當中，RICS提出嶄新概念，建議將「工業文物徑」納入整體發展大綱內。RICS認為可利用港鐵/輕軌/單軌鐵路為基礎，在每個鐵路站設立多個小型展覽區，再連結成一個「工業遺產之旅」，以作為教育及旅遊景點，成為發展九龍東項目的其中一個亮點。

關於英國皇家特許測量師學會及亞洲總部

RICS乃全球房地產以及建築業的專業指標。隨著更多市民、政府、銀行及商業機構要求更高質素的專業標準及操守鳳梨酥，RICS專業資格已成為行內專業程度的反映。現時於全球各個已發展及發展中地區已有超過100,000測量師獲註冊成為RICS會員。

RICS乃英國皇家特許的獨立的專業組織。自1868年成立起，RICS致力建立並維持優質及專業操守的最高標準，為業界和社會於重要議題上提供公正以及權威性的意見。RICS同時規範其個別會員及公司會員，以保持最高的專業水準，讓其能為客戶提供最佳服務。

RICS亞洲總部支援覆蓋亞洲區的逾11,000名個人會員，旨在透推廣專業標準、最佳作業守則及國際經驗，協助地產及建築業於該等城市的發展。學會推廣RICS及其會員成為地產界不可或缺的顧問，同時確保能為會員提供相關服務及發展機會。

RICS亞洲區總部的網絡覆蓋位於汶萊、馬來西亞、新加坡、泰國招牌廣告、中華人民共和國及香港特別行政區的國家級機構及本地組織。RICS亞洲區分會會員遍佈孟加拉、不丹、緬甸、柬埔寨、印尼、日本、吉里巴斯、老撾、澳門、蒙古、尼泊爾、北韓、南韓、台灣、馬爾代夫、菲律賓、東帝汶及越南。有關資料，請瀏覽：www.ricsasia.org。

傳媒查詢，請聯絡：

洪焯華先生／ 曾佩儀小姐

電話: +852-2372-0090

傳真: +852-2372-0490

手提: +852-9254-9250/ +852-6108-5435

電郵: andy@creativegp.com / polly@creativegp.com

新聞提供： 美通社

澳洲央行 (RBA) 總裁 Glenn Stevens 周三表示，澳元強勢對國家有益，因為強勢澳元可擴散礦業榮景的收益個人信貸，並提高消費者的購買力。



Glenn Stevens 表示關鍵字行銷，澳洲企業將須適應澳元持續的漲勢，員工也將須提高生產力。

澳元持續盤元在兌美元平價的水準附近高雄幼稚園，Stevens 也確認澳元的強勢挫傷了部分產業，例如製造業，但他認為這樣強勁的匯率也提升了消費者的消費能力大台北地區木工裝潢，並壓低了進口貨物的成本日本房地產。

Stevens 出席澳洲政府舉行的經濟論壇時表示：「過去 6 至 8 年間，生產力成長一直明顯趨緩。」

轉載自～ 鉅亨網

On June 27, 2012, China Petrochemical Development Corporation (“CPDC”) will hold its Annual General Meeting. The most critical ballot item for this year’s meeting is the election of directors, including two independent directors. Because of the LeaLea Enteprise Co., Ltd. (“LeaLea”) has recently disseminated false accusations to defame CPDC’s board and management team. The chairman & CEO, Sheen, Ching-Jing thereby sent a letter to CPDC’s shareholds to clarify some of the issues raised in these materials.



CPDC was state-owned enterprise originally, then listed in the stock market and privately operated according to the Statute of Privatization of Government-Owned Enterprises since 1994. The current management team, Core Pacific Group, has consistently created shareholder value since then.

CPDC is one of a few companies in Taiwan run by professional managers. Unlike many other Taiwanese enterprises, such as LeaLea Group, which are still family-owned, its ownership is clear and simple and hence it does not have the attending obstructions in financial capital. CPDC are transparent and pursue a single goal: maximizing value for its shareholder.

Mr Sheen, Ching-Jing emphasizes that CPDC under his team’s leadership was still able to achieve record performance last year, regardless of the difficulties presented by the extremely adverse global economic conditions. Altogether, CPDC’s team consisting of professional experts to grow CPDC and commit to grow with shareholders with the ultimate goal of maximizing shareholder value.

Mr Sheen’s Letter to shareholders is as following:

Dear Shareholders,

As we approach our 2012 Annual General Meeting (AGM), we recently learned that certain materials containing distorted, untruthful and potentially libelous criticisms have been disseminated by a group of dissident investors, which includes LeaLea Group, its affiliates and a consulting firm led by Alex Lee. Their actions have already greatly damaged CPDC’s reputation and shareholder value, and they fly in the face of CPDC’s core values. I would like to take this opportunity to clarify some of the issues raised in these materials.

CPDC’s current management team has consistently created shareholder value.

CPDC is one of a few companies in Taiwan run by professional managers. Unlike many other Taiwanese enterprises, such as LeaLea Group, which are still family-owned, our ownership is clear and simple and hence we do not have the attending obstructions in financial capital. We are transparent and pursue a single goal: maximizing value for our shareholders.

Although our board experienced a small degree of turnover last year (our former CEO Mr. Heng Feng resigned due to personal health concerns, now still is our subsidiary company’s chairman), CPDC continued to receive profound support from our foreign institutional (FINI) investors. Normally, a CEO’s resignation without cause results in a reduction of institutional shareholders’ holdings and thus causes downward pressure on the stock price. In contrast, our FINI investors not only did not reduce their interests, but also slightly increased their positions in July 2011 (see table below). In addition, our stock price reached a record high since 2005 at the time when the board was first under its current leadership.

This history strongly demonstrates the confidence of our FINI investors in both our BOD and management team.

Furthermore, CPDC under my team’s leadership was still able to achieve record performance last year, regardless of the difficulties presented by the extremely adverse global economic conditions. Altogether, we are truly a team consisting of professional experts to grow CPDC and commit to grow with our shareholders with the ultimate goal of maximizing shareholder value.

On the contrary, the dissidents have continued to buy and sell CPDC’s stock to pursue their personal financial interests, with complete disregard for the interests of CPDC’s other shareholders. They have even reduced their holdings since the AGM record date. For instance, one of the dissidents, Mr. Yan Shian Lu (盧燕賢), who is the largest individual shareholder of CPDC and has allied with LeaLea Group to pursue CPDC’s board seats, began to accumulate CPDC’s stock in March of 2010 when our stock was being traded in the low teens. He continued to accumulate shares of CPDC until our price reached the low ＄40s, at which point he began to sell his holdings. At one point, Mr. Lu and his affiliate’s aggregate holdings accounted for about 27.61% of CPDC’s outstanding shares. Such a round trip trading has brought him huge profits. The timing of Mr. Lu’s actions has been perfectly coincident with LeaLea Group’s contract breach detailed in next section.

As of record date, Mr. Lu held 17.23% of CPDC shares; he has continued to decrease his holdings to 12.83% as of June 6, 2012 (presumably after securing his voting rights), and according to recent records, his selloff continues.

This liquidation strongly demonstrates that Mr. Lu’s intentions are merely to pursue his own short-term personal financial interests, without any commitments to CPDC’s other shareholders. Nothing about his actions would suggest that he is a long term investor in our company’s stock. Does this sound to you like a shareholder who deserves to be represented on your company’s Board of Directors? I think not.

LeaLea Group, led by Mr. Shau Yi Guo (郭紹儀), has miserable records in its corporate governance practices – it has been charged and fined by the Financial Supervisory Commission several times.

To summarize LeaLea’s numerous corporate governance violations, I have summarized the records published by Financial Supervisory Commission Exchange Yuan and Taiwan Stock Exchange:

Year Violation Records of Regulations - LeaLea Group and its Subsidiary Li Peng Enterprise (1447) Consequences

2010 Article 157 of Securities and Exchanges Act - short-term traded its own stocks Fined with NT＄42.64 millionEnforcement of Returning Rights

Mar 2011 Article 43-1 of Securities and Exchange Act – failed to report the acquisition of LeaLea shares Enforced by Securities and Futures Bureau

July – Sept. 2010 Violation of its own Articles of Incorporation – Acquired CPDC’s shares over the limits approved by BOD Fined NT＄240,000 by Taiwan Stock Exchange

These records clearly showed that LeaLea Group has repeatedly violated stock trading regulations. Given the fact that LeaLea Group has a complicated shareholder structure and its subsidiaries cross-hold each other’s shares intensively, these records initiate tremendous concerns regarding how LeaLea can assure CPDC’s shareholders that it is accountable for its actions. Along the same lines, this also makes us worry about the potential risks of insider trading and related party transactions. In contrast, CPDC has recently strengthened our own internal controls through the launch of the Code of Ethics and the Management Integrity Code.

In addition to violating government regulations, LeaLea’s corporate governance practices are extremely weak and far below best practice standards. With such a record, we are absolutely not convinced that LeaLea’s current campaign has anything to do with improving CPDC’s corporate governance practices. Below are a few key points highlighted in China Times Weekly on Friday 5/11/2012.

LeaLea Group engaged with its subsidiaries in numerous related party financial transactions. For example, LeaLea funded Li Peng Enterprise’s acquisition of CPDC stock; Li Peng Enterprise is suspected of related party transactions, as it is one of CPDC’s downstream clients.

Although claiming the acquisition of CPDC’s stocks is for long-term investment, LeaLea’s financial report categorized the investment as short term.

LeaLea’s own Board of Directors contains no independent directors.

Among LeaLea’s five directors, some of them are third-degree relatives of the CEO and one of two supervisors is CEO’s direct family.

All shares allocated for LeaLea Group’s 2011 Employee Purchase Plan (targeted to provide broad-based employee incentives) were purchased by Mr. Guo.

LeaLea Group’s conspiracy to erode CPDC’s stock price.

In November 2011, Li Peng Enterprise, we suspect, intentionally violated the purchase agreement contract and resisted to purchase raw materials with agreed amount of 7,500 tons from CPDC. Instead, it only purchased 1,598 tons. Such a contract breach resulted in significant damage to CPDC’s stock price. We instantly raised great concerns to our regulation agencies as well as our shareholders regarding LeaLea Group’s conspiracy. It intentionally concealed its contradictory related party role in order to press down our stock price and disregarded our shareholders’ best interests to achieve its dirty goals – controlling our board. LeaLea’s intention is simple: to control the resources and edge out the other three of CPDC’s downstream customers – LeaLea Group’s competitors – by providing less raw material or increasing the purchase price after securing seats on our board. Those three downstream customers are very concerned about LeaLea Group’s aggressive hostility. They worry that their confidential business information may be revealed if LeaLea Group controls CPDC’s board and have threatened to terminate their business relationships with CPDC.

Broadening our customer base in order to diversify business risks and growing with our customers to sustain long term relationships with them have always been among CPDC’s core values. However, LeaLea Group is just not the candidate we would like to invite to join us in this endeavor. Their poor performance record and role as a related party will not only increase our business risks but will also be damaging to shareholder value. We can hardly imagine the consequences of having them on the board – increasing risks in insider trading, substantial

setbacks in corporate governance enhancements by engaging with related parties to the board, risks of losing clients and unsettled morale of CPDC employees. Thus, to protect our shareholders’ best interests we have also filed litigation regarding LeaLea Group’s violation of Article 19 of the Fair Trade Act and we sincerely hope our government agency can stop this dissident’s greed to pursue their own interests by sacrificing our shareholders’ value.

CPDC has consistently and substantially outperformed LeaLea.

Comparing LeaLea’s EPS between 2009 and 2011 of NT＄0.92, NT＄2.11, NT＄0.88 respectively, CPDC’s NT＄1.15, NT＄3.52 and NT＄5.53 easily outperformed LeaLea Group’s mediocre records (see chart below).

As the chart makes clear, CPDC’s performance has increased dramatically over the last three years, while LeaLea’s performance has been mediocre at best. How could LeaLea’s management team have a better business plan for CPDC when it is quite obviously doing such a poor job of tending its own garden?

With LeaLea Group’s poor performance with respect to both corporate governance and finance, I am confident that this letter can provide a clear and comprehensive insight regarding CPDC’s current management team. Based on our performance record, future business plan, and my personal dedication to continue to invest in CPDC without liquidating my shares, I cordially urge you to vote AGAINST their nominees and vote FOR our nominees.

Should you have any questions about the foregoing or CPDC itself, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Business Manager:

Mr. Ke-Shuan Wang, President +886-2-87878473

edkswang@cpdc.com.tw

Chief Financial Officer:

Mr. Jan-Song Yu, Vice President +886-2-87878370

jansonyu@cpdc.com.tw

Deputy General Manager, Shareholder Services:

Mr. Tien-Hsun Huang, Associate +886-2-87871194

tienhsun.huang@cpdc.com.tw

Spokesman:

Mr. Ching-Shien Yang, Vice President +886-2-87878460

csyang@cpdc.com.tw

Very sincerely yours,



Sheen, Ching-Jing沈慶京

Chairman & CEO of CPDC

轉載自～ 台灣醒報網頁設計鳳梨酥個人信貸關鍵字行銷高雄幼稚園

（中央社記者張謙香港13日電）據報導，大陸1名84歲的男性藝術家於4年前開始自行吃藥變性，是大陸迄今希望改變性別的最年長的人。



　　根據南方都市報今天的報導遊學，變性者為錢今凡，又名叫伊玲，是文藝理論家、收藏家、書法家；錢今凡曾在中國人民銀行、佛山畫院等單位工作，目前是佛山市文廣新局處級離休幹部。

據說，錢今凡於1928年在浙江嘉興出生；錢今凡雖生為男兒，但一生都希望以女性身分生活。

不過，他隱藏了一輩子直到80歲消毒公司，認定身體條件、心理條件成熟後，才於4年前以離休幹部身分，向佛山市文廣新局領導提交了變為女性的書信聲明日本房地產，並開始吃激素隆胸，穿上女裝。

2年前，他向佛山市文廣新局提交以女性身分生活的書信，沒有遭到反對。

　　近日，錢今凡首次以女性身分接受南都專訪，希望改變社會對變性人的偏見，並呼籲保障變性人的就業權益。

　　據報導，錢今凡現在是佛山市文廣新局的離休處級幹部，民革佛山市委成員。在家中，他是1位丈夫、1名父親。

　　錢今凡表示LED燈具，想成為女性的想法最早萌生於3歲時，而他的父母直到去世也不知道他有變性的願望；54歲結婚時，他的妻子也不知道。

　　2008年12月，錢今凡認為一切都準備好了大台北地區木工裝潢，才開始吃激素隆胸，穿上女裝；這一年他正好80歲，妻子60歲。1010613

文章來源： 中央社

旺報【記者韓化宇╱綜合報導】



大陸地方政府財政情況始終是「最高機密」，讓人看不清廬山真面目。根據一份調查顯示宜蘭民宿，大陸81個城市中，僅7個財政透明度達及格標準，及格率只有8.6%；同時有關預算外的開銷，81個城市竟無一公開。

這份由北京清華大學公布的《中國市級政府財政透明度研究》顯示，81個城市平均值3.46分，僅占滿分8分的43%自助婚紗，總體而言，大陸市級政府財政透明度處於不及格狀態。

新疆石河子市最低分

其中，北京得分最高為6分，占滿分的75%；上海其次，為5.75分，占滿分的72%。此外，得分4.8分、占滿分8分比例逾60%的城市，還有南陽、成都、宜昌、三亞、杭州，加總共7個城市，僅為81家城市的8.6%；若以80%為良好表現（6.4分），則81個城市中無一達標。

至於得分在4分以上（占滿分比例50%以上）的城市有34個，占81個城市的42%。得分最低的為新疆石河子市，其他依序為慶陽台北婚紗、包頭、松原、烏魯木齊國民服飾、洛陽、拉薩、煙台、邯鄲、酒泉。

除北京、上海、成都、杭州外，其餘直轄市、省會城市、計畫單列市與其他地級市相比，其財政並沒有比較透明或公開。

值得注意的是，該統計共分8項指標，其中「預算外活動、債務和金融資產、或有負債和稅收支出信息」，得分居然為0分，也就是說在81個城市中，沒有一個城市的政府公布預算外活動，這些不可告人的開銷，被人詬病是地方政府的「小金庫」。

此外，「公布政府性基金、土地出讓金、三公消費（公款吃喝、公務車消費和公費出國）、政府負債信息」得分為0.2分。

三公消費仍不得窺見

其中，「三公消費」長期被媒體報導抨擊，許多地方財政遭官員挪用在吃喝上，成為腐敗來源；這些預算自然不讓外界窺視。

《中國經濟周刊》引述1名「經常參加政府宴請的駐中國使館官員」稱：「中國有著最好的酒店、最貴的食物、和令他們羨慕不已的輕鬆記帳。」

北京清華大學公共管理學院經濟學教授俞喬指出，地方政府就像是上市公司，本質上也是經濟單位，需要向所有利益相關者公開訊息。只有訊息公開透明化，才能保障民主化實現。

文章來源： 旺報認證車

工商時報【記者孫彬訓╱台北報導】



醫療險即將在7月調漲，讓近期醫療險買氣超旺。壽險公司建議，趁年輕時及早投保，不僅較少病史，且在經濟不景氣時，因病就醫更需要醫療險的補助，所以不管有錢沒錢，最好都要買醫療險才安心。

第一金人壽總經理林元輝表示，醫療保險的商品很多，主要三種基本險種，包括住院醫療、癌症及重大疾病險。

住院醫療險針對疾病或意外而住院治療的部份理賠，範圍最廣，而癌症與重大疾病都是針對特定疾病，但因為癌症與多項重大疾病多年來都名列國人10大死因，可列次要購買的險種。

林元輝說，一旦住院治療，住院醫療險可以補貼每天住院的費用，如果因為癌症或重大疾病住院治療，更可以利用這兩種險種的保險金，補貼其他手術治療的重大支出，所以完整的醫療保障要包括這三大類保險台南關山黑糖。

國華人壽表示，台灣民眾的投保率已突破200％，但重儲蓄輕保障的觀念，使國人的保費支出和保額一直呈明顯落差；保險理財之前，一定要先將人生風險做妥善的規劃，並且隨著不同的人生階段調整，才能發揮保險保障最大的功能。

林元輝強調，如果購買終身醫療險主約，每年保費多要2~3萬元，如果加上癌症險主約及重大疾病險主約陽明山有線電視，每年保費更高，因而讓部分民眾卻步，事實上，預算充足的民眾仍應選擇完整的醫療保障，如果預算有限的話，可以考慮用附約或是購買1年期的定期健康險。

這類保險保障範圍較小，但保費便宜許多，像是1年期住院醫療附約，如果日額給付2,000元，每年保費約6,000~8,000元地勤人員招考，但要注意是否保證續保，才不會因為生病理賠後而被拒保，也必須記得每年繳費，才不會讓保障出現空窗期。

林元輝說，不管是傳統型或投資型保單，都有醫療險網站設計、癌症險、及重大疾病險附約可加保，費用方面以投資型保單附加醫療附約的方式較便宜。

以第一金人壽富貴人生變額萬能壽險來看，可以附加癌症、重大疾病險。癌症給付方面，包括每日住院療養金3,000元、初次罹癌30萬元、住院手術治療60,000元，門診手術及化療每次3,000元玻璃隔熱紙，30歲男性年繳保費為576元。

若是以重大疾病險來看，保額50萬元，年繳保費約720元，也提供保證續保效，但他提醒，定期醫療附約主要是提供暫時的保障，長期仍建議民眾購買完整的醫療險種。

轉載自～ 中時電子報